
|

For years the concept of the remake or revision of an already existing film has
been a big thing for Hollywood and even independent filmmakers. There have
been an ungodly amount of these monstrosities, but I’ll admit that there have
been quite a few exceptions. In order to keep this as short as possible,
I’ll only be going as far back as the 80’s. This is just a brief recap on
a couple of the bad eggs, as well as some of the goodies.
In the 80’s for some reason or
another, in the time of a lot of cheese ball flicks, we were
brought some tasteful remakes such as John Carpenters ‘The
Thing’ (1982). Though not exactly a remake, it was based more
on the original story written by John W. Cambell Jr.. The
original film directed by Christian Nyby ‘The Thing From Another
World’ (1951) was more of a monster movie. Small tidbits of the
story were used to make things a bit more interesting for the
viewers of a time when monsters and big bugs were the things
that went bump in the night. See, this in my opinion makes for
a good remake. If John Carpenter had actually remade the
original he would have just gone the typical monster route that
horror was slowly, but never completely straying away from.
Another example of true taste as well as complete
respect to its predecessor would be David Cronenberg’s ‘The Fly’
(1986). What I mean by taste and respect is that if a remake or
revision is going to be done, yes it should be a bit different
from its original, but credit must be given where credit is
due. Of course you don’t want the exact same film again (ex:
Psycho), but give it some style and update it a bit, still using
the basic formula given by our early creators. In ‘The Fly’,
Cronenberg had used the original idea but used the changes that
were beginning to form the world around us. For instance,
instead of booths for teleportation, we had computer programmed
pods, something that was never seen in films of the old days,
not to mention the use of DNA. In the original movie the lead
character had remained a man, but with the head and hand of a
fly, whereas in the remake he slowly became the fly. His
combined DNA with that of a small house fly created a horrific
creature, one that didn’t have the exact characteristics of a
fly, much like the original, but yet the look of flesh and bone
as well as insect. If you pay attention, maybe with the
exception of the eyes and his eating habits, Seth Brundle played
by Jeff Goldblum had more of a humanoid look about him, which
was, for our times a much more believable transformation.
Now, I won’t be getting into detail on these next few,
but just giving some honorable mention. We had been delivered
remakes and revisions such as Wes Cravens 1972 classic ‘Last
House on the Left‘, a revision of Ingmar Bergman’s ‘The Virgin
Spring’ made in 1960 and Chuck Russel’s 1988 remake of ‘The
Blob’ which was also more realistic to our times than the
original which was directed by Irwin S. Yeaworth Jr. in 1958.
Moving forward to the 90’s and 2000’s, more so within
the past several years, the concept of the remake and revision
has taken a new step; a step towards the downward spiral of the
horror genre. Not only has this virus infected the mainstream
with full force, but has begun to infect the underground as
well. These days it seems as if the Hollywood filmmakers and
the script writers have lost all originality. There are many
older films that should be left alone and remembered the way
they were and still are, classics. With some of my exceptions
including ‘The Hills Have Eyes‘, ‘The Texas Chainsaw Massacre‘,
and very few others, the majority of remakes these days lack the
respect and originality that the films they are imitating
deserve. That’s all some of these films are, fucking
imitations. Remakes such as ‘The Omen‘, ‘The Wicker Man‘, ‘When
a Stranger Calls’, ‘Black Christmas’ and many others have taken
the thoughts and creativity of classic filmmakers and writers
and flushed their idea’s right down the fucking toilet, straight
to a giant shit filled septic tank.
When it comes to the independent world I cannot say it
hasn’t had its fair share of remakes or revisions done in ways
that would just make you have to laugh. One film that I will
say I enjoyed but I feel should not have been made in the
independent world would be David DeFalco’s ‘Chaos’ (2005).
Though said not to be, it is flat out obvious that it is a
remake of ‘Last House on the Left‘. Not to put it down, because
it was damn brutal and quite enjoyable, but DeFalco as well as
the films producers have refused to acknowledge or accept the
fact that it is most definitely a remake in some way or
another. Although the brutality in ‘Chaos’ is exactly what we
the fans love to see, even Helen Keller could notice it’s
unoriginality. (Note: We at Cinema Eulogies completely support
the deaf, dumb and blind.)
When it comes to these big budget Hollywood remakes
the originality is gone. It seems that the few good ones have
come from foreign directors or those who used to be independent
film makers. ‘The Hills Have Eyes’ (2006) was a brilliant
revision of the original 1977 Wes Craven classic. It paid much
homage and gave a new and interesting twist, aside from the fact
that it was violent as hell. Having the director of the
brilliant ‘Haute Tension‘, Alexandre Aja was a prime pick for
originality considering his obvious love for the true aspects of
the genre. The independent world as well has attempted to do a
somewhat revision of ’The Hills Have Eyes’, thus came Leigh
Slawner’s ‘Hillside Cannibals‘. Though using the name of the
family the original ‘The Hills Have Eyes’ was based on, this ok
but not so great film is set around the Sawney Bean Family, a
cave
dwelling
cannibalistic clan. The actual events took place in 16th
century Scotland, yet this film has it based in our times with
the same family. ‘Hillside Cannibals’ is not all that much of a
treat but it can definitely be enjoyed by the cheese fan in some
of us.
Now on the other hand, when it comes to films that have left
shit stains on the screen,
my biggest
example would be Zack Snyder’s 2004 fuck up entitled ‘Dawn of
the Dead‘. Remaking this film was one of the biggest upsets of
my life.
The original in my opinion is one of the
finest pieces in horror history, and one of the best in the
genre. The outcome was a complete disgrace, they paid little to
no homage or respect to the original film, with the exception of
using a mall. Throughout majority of the film I witnessed just
some of the most asinine shit I have ever seen, I’m sure those
that agree understand what I‘m saying. Now, if the film did not
use the title and based it in a different location, a warehouse
perhaps, it may have been a semi enjoyable film. But no, what we
witnessed was something that was more like a sequel to ‘28 Days
Later‘ (‘28DL’ being an excellent film, so don’t take this the
wrong way, I am in no way bashing it). Even though ’28 Days
Later’ was not a zombie film, it still would have made more
sense for it to be called a sequel to that rather than a remake
to ‘Dawn Of The Dead‘. The idea of zombies that can run at
ridiculous speeds pisses me off. Well not totally, but in the
case of this particular film it was un-fucking-called for.
George A. Romero’s 1978 masterpiece should have been left the
fuck alone, or the least they could have done was give it to
someone who would have really respected the classic. But we
can’t always blame the director. I was shocked at the way the
remake of ‘DOTD’ turned out considering the screenplay used was
written by James Gunn, writer and director of ‘Slither’ which
was one hell of a cool flick, not to mention being the writer,
non-credited director and co-producer of a true Troma classic
‘Tromeo and Juliette’. Maybe Gunn should stick to original
ideas and not attempt to write remakes anymore. There were some
aspects of the film that were excellent, such as the acting and
the overall look and feel. But sadly, even that did little to no
justice at all.
In my opinion, foreign filmmakers brought here to
make films for the U.S.A. tend to be the best, but this is not
always the case. What happened with the ‘Grudge’ films?
Directed by Takashi Shimizu, the same man who directed the
original Japanese versions, ‘Ju-on’ and ‘Ju-on 2’ both made in
2000. So what the fuck happened with the remakes? The Japanese
versions were excellent, truly scary and not to mention creepy
films. But once we, the good old U.S. of A. (more so Hollywood
to be specific) got our dirty little hands on him and the rights
to his films, god only knows what was done to them by the
corporate cunts who decided to release them. Though they may not
have been completely to blame, I’m sure they had a hell of a lot
to do with the destruction of these films. They could have done
a good job and at least attempted to really scare the audience,
but why do that? And having Sam Raimi produce these films was,
to me, an embarrassment to the horror community. Being the
creator of the brilliant ‘Evil Dead’ trilogy, even with his
whole spider man kick, which I have to say I did enjoy, it still
sucks to think that when it comes to horror films he would get
involved in the whole teenie-bopper type of horror bullshit. As
if this wasn’t enough, we got the green light on The ‘Grudge 3’,
I mean seriously, please, I beg you… Stop! The reason that this
shit will not stop is simple, it’s too damn popular to commit
these crimes against classic horror celluloid, even though some
may not be classics just yet, they are still good films that do
not deserve what has, is and will continue being done to them.
Turning films that are still brutal, horrifying and
gory into PG13 pieces of shit is a goddamn sin, and some of
these people should be burned at the steaks for committing
crimes against humanity and luring the innocent to their evil
bidding, just as witches were back in the day. Not that I
believe that the whole witch trial thing was right, but when it
comes to these films, the corporations and big shots of fucking
Hollywood that are allowing this filth to be released are the
treacherous mongrels that should be set ablaze! I cant even
completely blame the filmmakers or writers in certain occasions,
some of these films may have been written to be more violent or
scary. But no, what the money givers want is what they almost
always get. They want to appeal to general public, whom nowadays
look down upon ultra violence, sleaze and extreme gore… for the
most part anyway. But who gives a fuck, seriously, there are
still many people like myself out there who want films that reek
beautifully of pure havoc.
I would get deeper and much further into the likings
and disliking of certain films that should be left alone, but I
have rambled on long enough. The point to this article is to
express the feelings of myself and I’m sure more than a few
other horror fans from around the globe. Though some of the
things I may have said may not be the views of others, I do know
from reading and listening to other horror fans that there are
plenty others like me that do believe that certain films should
be left as they are and not scumfucked by those that have no
imagination, creativity or respect. I also can’t even begin to
express how I feel about the many remakes/revisions that are on
the way to a theatre near you or even straight to DVD. The
insanity has got to stop. Perhaps some will be great but of
course many will most likely be disturbingly awful. Either way,
I and I’m sure many of you other true horror fans, would much
rather not have them at all than deal with most of the trash we
have and will continue to be dealt. True fans should all gather
and rally against this heinous crime but unfortunately there is
no point, it will continue for as long as people will continue
to watch. There is no saving these masterpieces from being
destroyed. Not to tare apart the past anymore, I just prey for
the future. We will all have to sit back and just let it
happen.
Unfortunately, my fellow gorehounds and gorewhores,
like I said, many more are on the way. Prepare yourselves for
some heartache, for the most part at least. Lets just keep hope
that a few of these films will do some justice and pay the much
deserved homage that many of those that are being remade
deserve.
|
Copyright © 2006-2008
Cinema Eulogies |